对于聚酰胺TFC-FO膜，可分别通过优化活性分离层和支撑层来获得理想的膜性能，而其中分离层对膜性能的影响尤其重要。因此，本文首先将六甲基磷酰胺（HMPA）作为极性非质子溶剂添加到水相溶液中进行界面聚合以制备TFC-FO膜，并进一步对添加不同浓度HMPA的聚酰胺TFC-FO膜进行结构分析和性能表征，以研究HMPA添加量对膜结构和性能的影响。结果表明，随着HMPA浓度的增加，聚酰胺的交联度呈现先升高后降低的趋势，2.0 wt%添加量时的交联度最大。同时，不同HMPA添加量对膜的微观形貌也有影响，分离层的厚度和粗糙度随着HMPA添加量的增加而增大。此外，研究还发现膜表面的亲水性受到化学结构和表面形貌共同作用的影响。以1 mol/L的NaCl溶液和去离子水分别作为汲取液和原料液，添加2.0 wt％HMPA与未添加相比，膜通量提升约60％，且在较高水通量下膜具有较低的盐水比。

 In order to improve the performance of the composite forward osmosis membrane, it mainly starts from the following two aspects, optimizing the porous support layer and changing the structure of the active separation layer, while the active separation layer plays an important role on properties of membrane. In this paper, as a polar aprotic solvent, hexamethyl phosphoramide (HMPA) was added to the aqueous solution during the interfacial polymerization process. A series of characterizations of polyamide composite forward osmosis membranes with different HMPA concentrations were performed to observe the effect of the aqueous phase additive HMPA on membrane performance. Results showed that the cross-linking degree of the polyamide increased first and then decreased with the increase of HMPA concentration, and achieved the top value at 2.0 wt%. The morphology of the membrane surface indicated that HMPA had an effect on the surface morphology of the membrane, and the skin layer thickness and surface roughness of the membrane increased gradually. What’s more, it can be found that the hydrophilicity of the membrane surface was influenced by its chemical structure and surface morphology. The results of water flux and reverse salt flux showed that the water flux of M2 (2.0 % HMPA addition) increased by about 60% compared with M0 (without HMPA) while with a lower salt water ratio under FO mode for 1 mol/L NaCl draw solution from a de-ionized water feed solution.

[1] Akther N, Sodiq A, Giwa A, et al. Recent advancements in forward osmosis desalination: A review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 281(1): 502-522.
[2] Li D, Yan Y, Wang H. Recent advances in polymer and polymer composite membranes for reverse and forward osmosis processes. Progress in Polymer Science, 2016, 61: 104-155.
[3] 方彦彦,田野,王晓琳.正渗透的机理[J].膜科学与技术,2011,31(6):95-100.
[4] 王涛,王宁,陆金仁,等.正渗透膜污染特征及抗污染正渗透膜研究进展[J].膜科学与技术,2017,37(1):125-132.
[5] Cornelissen E R, Harmsen D, Beerendonk E F, et al. The innovative osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) for reuse of wastewater. Water Science ＆Technology, 2011, 63(8): 1557-1565.
[6] 胡群辉,邹昊,姜莹,等.正渗透膜分离关键技术及其应用进展[J].膜科学与技术,2014,34(5):109-115.
[7] Yang S, Kim K Y, Chae K J, et al. Evaluation of energy and water recovery in forward osmosis–bioelectrochemical hybrid system with cellulose triacetate and polyamide asymmetric membrane in different orientations. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2016, 57(16): 7406-7413.
[8] Suwaileh W A, Johnson D J, Sarp S, et al. Advances in forward osmosis membranes: Altering the sub-layer structure via recent fabrication and chemical modification approaches. Desalination, 2018, 436: 176-201.
[9] Kai Y W, Chung T H, Amy G. Developing thin-film-composite forward osmosis membranes on the PES/SPSf substrate through interfacial polymerization. Aiche Journal, 2012, 58(3): 770-781.
[10] Qiu M, Wang J, He C. A stable and hydrophilic substrate for thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane revealed by in-situ cross-linked polymerization. Desalination, 2018, 433: 1-9.
[11] Wei J, Qiu C, Tang C Y, et al. Synthesis and characterization of flat-sheet thin film composite forward osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, 372(1-2): 292-302.
[12] Yao Z, Guo H, Yang Z, et al. Reactable substrate participating interfacial polymerization for thin film composite membranes with enhanced salt rejection performance. Desalination, 2018, 436: 1-7.
[13] Tian M, Wang R. Synthesis and characterization of novel high-performance thin film nanocomposite (TFN) FO membranes with nanofibrous substrate reinforced by functionalized carbon nanotubes. Desalination, 2015, 370(4): 79-86.
[14] Huang Y, Wang D. Performance of composite reverse osmosis membranes fabricated with polyester mesh as support. Journal of Functional Materials, 2011, 42(7): 1249-1252.
[15] Emadzadeh D, Lau W J, Matsuura T, et al. Synthesis and characterization of thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane with hydrophilic nanocomposite support to reduce internal concentration polarization. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 449(1): 74-85.
[16] Ma N, Wei J, Qi S, et al. Nanocomposite substrates for controlling internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 441(15): 54-62.
[17] Emadzadeh D, Lau W J, Matsuura T, et al. The potential of thin film nanocomposite membrane in reducing organic fouling in forward osmosis process. Desalination, 2014, 348: 82-88.
[18] Wei J, Liu X, Qiu C, et al. Influence of monomer concentrations on the performance of polyamide-based thin film composite forward osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, 381(1): 110-117.
[19] Ghosh A K, Jeong B H, Huang X, et al. Impacts of reaction and curing conditions on polyamide composite reverse osmosis membrane properties. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 311(1): 34-45.
[20] Duan M, Wang Z, Xu J, et al. Influence of hexamethyl phosphoramide on polyamide composite reverse osmosis membrane performance. Separation and Purification Technology, 2010, 75(2): 145-155.
[21] Khorshidi B, Thundat T, Pernitsky D, et al. A parametric study on the synergistic impacts of chemical additives on permeation properties of thin film composite polyamide membrane. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 535: 248-257.
[22] Sung Ho K, Seung-Yeop K, Takenori S. Positron annihilation spectroscopic evidence to demonstrate the flux-enhancement mechanism in morphology-controlled thin-film-composite (TFC) membrane. Environmental Science ＆Technology, 2005, 39(6): 1764-1770.
[23] Dutta D, Bhattacharyya A, Ganguly B N. Microstructural study of aromatic polyamide membrane material. Journal of Membrane Science, 2003, 224(1): 127-135.